How Do You Spell AGENCY BY RATIFICATION?

Pronunciation: [ˈe͡ɪd͡ʒənsi ba͡ɪ ɹˌatɪfɪkˈe͡ɪʃən] (IPA)

The spelling of "Agency by Ratification" may seem confusing at first glance, but it can be easily broken down using the International Phonetic Alphabet. The word "Agency" is pronounced as /ˈeɪ.dʒən.si/ with stress on the first syllable "A". "By" is pronounced as /baɪ/. "Ratification" is pronounced as /ˌræ.tɪ.fɪˈkeɪ.ʃən/ with stress on the third syllable "fi". This legal term refers to a situation in which a principal accepts the actions of an agent who acted on their behalf without prior authorization.

AGENCY BY RATIFICATION Meaning and Definition

  1. Agency by ratification refers to a legal doctrine that allows an individual (the principal) to retroactively accept and be bound by the actions of another person (the agent) who acted on their behalf without prior authorization. This principle is based on the belief that a person should be able to ratify an action taken in their name as long as they were aware of the details and consequences involved.

    For agency by ratification to occur, certain conditions must be met. Firstly, the agent must have acted on behalf of the principal, assuming they were acting as the principal's agent and adhering to their best interests. The principal must also have knowledge of the agent's actions and the ability to ratify or reject them. It is important to note that the principal cannot ratify an action if they were not aware of it.

    Once the principal becomes aware of the agent's actions, they have the option to either approve or disapprove of them. If they choose to ratify the action, they essentially adopt it, making it legally binding as if they had originally authorized it. The principal becomes liable for any legal obligations, benefits, or consequences arising from the ratified action.

    Agency by ratification serves as a key legal principle in establishing the authority and responsibilities between parties in cases where an agent has acted without prior authorization. It allows for flexibility and fairness in situations where an agent may have made decisions on behalf of the principal in good faith but lacked explicit consent.