How Do You Spell CUTTER V. WILKINSON?

Pronunciation: [kˈʌtə vˈiː wˈɪlkɪnsən] (IPA)

The word "cutter" in the case name "Cutter v. Wilkinson" is spelled phonetically in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as /ˈkʌtər/. The IPA symbols 'k', 'ʌ', 't', and 'ə' represent the sounds of "k" as in "cat", "uh" as in "up", "t" as in "top", and a schwa sound respectively. Similarly, "Wilkinson" is spelled as /ˈwɪlkɪnsən/ in IPA, with symbols representing the sounds of "w" as in "we", "ɪ" as in "it", and "ns" as in "once". The IPA phonetic transcription is an effective tool for understanding the pronunciation and spelling of words.

CUTTER V. WILKINSON Meaning and Definition

  1. Cutter v. Wilkinson is a landmark legal case that originated in the United States and holds significant importance in the field of religious freedom and prisoners' rights. The case revolves around the interpretation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) of 2000, an important federal law designed to protect the religious rights of individuals who are confined within prisons or other institutions.

    The case was heard before the Supreme Court of the United States in 2005 and involved several inmates in the Ohio prison system who asserted that their religious rights were being violated. The inmates argued that the prison's policies and regulations were unduly burdening their ability to freely exercise their religious beliefs and practices.

    In its ruling, the Supreme Court held that the RLUIPA does indeed protect the religious rights of individuals held in state prisons and other similar institutions. The Court emphasized that prison administrators cannot impose policies that substantially burden an inmate's sincerely held religious beliefs unless they can demonstrate that such imposition is necessary for the institution's legitimate penological interests.

    The decision in Cutter v. Wilkinson established an important precedent in ensuring religious rights for incarcerated individuals. It highlighted the vital role that RLUIPA plays in safeguarding religious freedom in prison settings and clarified the scope of protection that inmates are entitled to under this law. This case continues to influence subsequent legal interpretations regarding religious freedom and prisoners' rights in the United States.